ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03646
INDEX CODE: 111.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period of
28 Apr 03 to 27 Apr 04, be removed from his records.
________________________________________________________________
_
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 6 May 08, the Board considered and denied a similar request.
For an accounting of the facts surrounding his previous request
and the rationale of the Board's earlier decision, see the
Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E.
On 8 Aug 08, the applicant requested the Board reconsider his
request. The applicant cites Coercion by Superiors as defined
in AFI 36-2406, Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Systems as his
justification. He states the Air Force recommendation was based
on the belief that his motive was not to correct an injustice
but to have his promotion backdated. He believes the report is
an injustice. In support of his request he provided an email
communiqué.
His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. After careful reconsideration of his request and his most
recent submission, we do not find it sufficiently compelling to
warrant a revision of the Boards earlier determination in this
case. We remain unpersuaded that the contested EPR should be
removed from his records. Therefore, we believe the applicant
has not been the victim of an error or injustice. In the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
2. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered BC-2007-03646 in
Executive Session on 15 January 2009, under the provisions of
AFI 36-2603:
Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Ms. XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
Mr. XXXXXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 18 Jun 08, w/Exhibits.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 8 Aug 08, w/atch.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-04010
He would have been promoted; however, the referral EPR was not removed from his record until after he retired. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03646
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His report was not written by the correct rater and lacks counseling or performance feedback. To support his claim that the report was not written by the designated rater he provided, in addition to other documents, a statement from the rater who wrote the report, a statement from the rater he believes should have written the report and a statement from the first sergeant. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02545 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His enlisted performance report (EPR) with a close-out date of 10 Nov 04 be upgraded or removed from his records. In support of his request, the applicant provided statements in his own behalf, a chronological record of events,...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00245
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2008-00245 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted supplemental promotion consideration for the 2008 Senior Master Sergeant (E-8) cycle, and subsequent promotion cycles, with an enlisted performance report (EPR) selection record that includes ten years of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2005-02368-2
On 9 Mar 06, the Board considered and denied his request after finding that he had not provided the evidence necessary to substantiate the value of a senior rater endorsement (Exhibit F). However, his statement appears to be based primarily on his personal opinion that the applicant should have received a senior rater endorsement. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 10 July...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05342
The Evaluation Report Appeals Board (ERAB) directed that his EPR closing 29 Jun 06 be replaced; however, he should have been provided supplemental promotion consideration for promotion cycles 07E8 and 08E8. Regarding the applicants contention his EPR covering the period 1 Apr 05 through 30 Sep 06, which is only a matter of record because he requested that it replace another report, was in error because it was not signed by his additional rater at the time in violation of AFI 36-2406, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01841
For these acts, the applicant was punished by a reduction in grade to staff sergeant, with a date of rank of 7 Mar 07, and a reprimand. The applicant was rendered a referral EPR for the period 15 Aug 06 through 15 Mar 06 (sic), which included the following statements: During this period member indecently assaulted a female Airman for which he received an Article 15/demotion, and Vast potentialdemonstrated poor judgment unbecoming of an Air Force NCOconsider for promotion. On 18 Mar...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04745
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04745 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 24 Apr 10, she petitioned the AFBCMR (Docket Number BC-2010- 02102) to void her referral EPR for the period 18 Oct 07 through 28 Oct 08, contending she was not given sufficient time to adjust to the new workout plan given to her by her doctors. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03204
Applicant states the evaluation of performance markings do not match up with the rater/additional rater's comments and promotion recommendation. 3.8.5.2 states do not suspense or require raters to submit signed/completed reports any earlier than five duty days after the close-out date. The applicant contends that he did not receive feedback and that neither the rater, nor the additional rater was his rater’s rater.
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-00344
f. On or about 4 Nov 05, his rater reprised against him by not recommending an end-of-tour decoration due to his stated intent to make a protected communications to the 92 ARW/IG and his commander. Further, he was never provided any feedback that his supervisor was contemplating giving him an overall “4” rating. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence...